It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
One technology giant on the forefront of renewable energy implementation has come out on why it rolled back its research and development while another, which has been largely inactive on the sustainability front, has just announced a new goal of achieving 100 percent renewable energy use.
While Google Inc. engineers have finally spoken up this week in an in about the reasons the company has cut funding for the research and development of renewable energy, Amazon.com Inc.'s Web services division just "a long-term commitment" to achieving full reliability on renewable energy for its "global infrastructure footprint."
Greenpeace activists have criticized Amazon in the past for moving slowly to improve on renewable energy while companies like Microsoft Corp. and Google make investments in sustainability (, July 16).
Amazon sprouts carbon-neutral regions
"They are a huge part of the Internet," he said.
The company said that the fact that it hosts the data and servers of so many companies means it is efficient based on its very nature.
"Because [Amazon Web Services] pools resources, customers who deploy applications in the cloud reduce their carbon footprint by default and significantly reduce the amount of environmental waste that occurs when individual data centers don't operate near their capacity," the release said.
The company also pointed out some of its carbon-neutral infrastructure.
"AWS introduced its first carbon-neutral region -- US West (Oregon) -- in 2011. Today, AWS offers customers three AWS Regions that are 100 percent carbon-neutral -- US West (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt), and AWS GovCloud (US)."
In some ways, Google's rolling back on its research and development into renewable technologies is symbolic of a greater understanding of the larger needs of humanity in general in terms of eventually reducing our carbon footprint on the planet.
Engineers Ross Koningstein and David Fork said that the canceling of Google's RE
Google rethinks sustainability
They said their plan to outcompete coal wouldn't work.
"Even if that dream had come to pass, it still wouldn't have solved climate change. This realization was frankly shocking: Not only had RE
Another recent study from the Breakthrough Institute has found similar problems with the development of energy efficiency -- namely, that increasing energy efficiency of technologies like light bulbs or other things has never led to the net reduction of power use in the past as it tends to only result in the proliferation of energy and resulting development (, Oct. 9).
No comments:
Post a Comment