Friday, October 31, 2014

Plan Now for Future Ebola Outbreaks

Diagnostics, vaccines and new drugs could vastly improve the way future Ebola outbreaks manifest in Africa, according to emerging infectious disease expert Jeremy Farrar. Steve Mirsky reports. October 31, 2014 | |

“Classic public health, isolation and respect and dignity for the people infected, and respect and dignity if individuals do die that they’re buried in appropriate manner, is absolutely critical to bringing this epidemic under control.”


Jeremy Farrar is an expert and the director of the Wellcome Trust, a global charitable health foundation. He talked about the current in West Africa during a produced by the on October 22nd.


“The society where these epidemics are occurring are ultimately going to be critical to bringing the epidemic under control.


“I believe in the 21st century, the classic public health measures that are critical can be complemented by the addition of rapid diagnostics; by the development of vaccines, assessment of safety and efficacy and then deployment; and by the development of drugs. The drugs themselves may not change the epidemic curve, but they may change the relationship the health care facilities and workers have with the community.


“If you offer hope to a previously untreated infection, you will change the way that people present, you will remove some of the stigma and you will be able to demonstrate that people can survive from Ebola. And I believe that is absolutely critical. Being a young doctor during the early stages of HIV in Western Europe, it was amazing the change that occurred both in lives, but also in attitudes toward HIV, when we developed antiretroviral drugs.”


To listen to the entire 84-minute discussion, which also includes Paul Farmer of Partners in Health and Matthew Arduino from the CDC, just go to the website of the and find their special page on the Ebola outbreak. It’s


—Steve Mirsky



Book Review: Symbiont

SymbiontOrbit, 2014 (($26))


In this book, the second in Grant's Parasitology series of thrillers, a medical breakthrough is not all that it seems. Most of the world lives with implanted genetically engineered tapeworms that boost the immune system, protect against illness and secrete helpful drugs. The powerful biotech company behind the worms has an interest in keeping any risks under wraps, but a serious danger becomes public when a zombielike sleepwalking sickness begins infecting people. Now scientists who created the extraordinary worms have to grapple with a creation they can no longer control.


New Artifact-Filled Chambers Revealed under Teotihuacan

Rooms beneath the mysterious city contain jade statues, jaguar remains and thousands of other objects


October 31, 2014 | | |

Scans of a tunnel complex under the Temple of the Feathered Serpent show the large entry hole as well as the small shaft that allowed it to be discovered. Further on are a series of chambers, the first found in 2013 and the next this past year, under the ancient city of Teotihuacan.


More In This Article


Scientists with the Mexican government announced Wednesday the discovery of three new chambers at the end of a tunnel under the ancient city of Teotihuacan. The tunnel was discovered in 2003 beneath the popular tourist destination just outside today’s Mexico City and is among the most important finds in the lost city’s history.


In a press briefing at the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico City, Mexican archeologists say that the new rooms contained thousands of objects, including carved statues, rubber balls, jade from Guatemala and a wooden box of shells. Beyond some traces of skin, however, no bodies have been discovered, although archaeologists have hypothesized that the site holds a burial chamber, perhaps still buried in the soil. “Just before the chambers is where we found very important offerings—a lot of them—alongside many objects," says Sergio Gomez, who directs the excavation project.


Archeologists know very little about mountain city of Teotihuacan. The tunnel, discovered 11 years ago under the Temple of the Feathered Serpent at the heart of the ancient metropolis, is the latest piece in a puzzle dating back to before Europeans arrived in the New World. “These findings are very important, both for the quantity and the quality of materials being discovered,” wrote George Cowgill, a professor at Arizona State University in Tempe who directs a research center at Teotihuacan, in an e-mail. It will probably take years of analysis to truly understand the significance of each object and the assemblage, he added.


As a city, Teotihuacan began around 150 B.C. and collapsed sometime in the seventh century A.D. During that time it was probably the most powerful city in all of North America, dominating even the Classic Maya, who were their lowland contemporaries far to the east in what is now southern Mexico and Guatemala.


The inhabitants of Teotihuacan, unlike the Maya, did not have a system of writing and thus we know very little about how they lived or ran their city. For instance, archeologists debate their political structure: One side envisions a single omnipotent ruler whereas the other sees a joint rule shared by four competing factions.


Unfortunately, Teotihuacan has neither images of its kings nor royal burials, although scientists have found numerous high-ranking nobles. The discovery of a royal burial under the Temple of the Feathered Serpent might upend everything known about the city.


The tunnel itself was discovered when a heavy rainstorm exposed a shaft that led to a spot about halfway down its length. The shaft’s purpose remains a mystery but scientists believe the tunnel had a ceremonial purpose, and it is possible that the shaft was used for astronomical purposes.


Over the next decade Gomez’s team dug out the tunnel and found numerous offerings. Their work culminated in 2013 with the discovery of a series of two chambers on either side of the tunnel near the end filled with pyrite mirrors and strange crystal spheres. After that the tunnel dropped below the water table. "The water has made our work move slower, however the large quantity of water below has enabled the preservation of materials like wood, rubber and even skin fragments," Gomez says.


He and his team announced Wednesday that three more chambers lay beyond the initial two, oriented in a sort of cross just a few dozen feet down the tunnel. In and around those chambers he found more puzzling objects, including a wooden box filled with shells imported from the ocean and carved by stone tools.


In addition, there were four 60-centimeter-tall jade statues, rubber balls and jaguar remains. They also report finding fragments of skin, although they can’t be sure yet if it is human. Human or not, there are no obvious burials in any of the chambers but that does not mean that the quest for a Teotihuacan burial is over. “These could be funerary offerings but I wonder if they might be remains of a huge feast—a feast that might have been part of a great funerary and sacrificial ceremony, especially considering the large number of rather plain jars,” Cowgill wrote. He added that other objects in the chamber reinforce the importance of women in Teotihuacan society as well as the long reach of their trade.


Gomez’s team is in the process of excavating the rooms down to the floors and it is possible there are nobles buried in the detritus or even below the chamber floors. He expects the work to continue and remains optimistic that a body will be found. “It's very exciting because it corroborates our hypothesis that this could be an offering for something more important that lies beneath. And the hypothesis is that there is a burial site but we won’t know for sure until next year."


Car Collision Physics

I came across this car collision problem, and thought you guys might be interested in tackling it.

I was involved in a car accident. My car was thrown 83 feet. The guy who hit me was driving a 2002 Thunderbird, weighing 3,775 pounds. My car was a 2006 Toyota Matrix, weighing 2,679 pounds. Is there any way that I can calculate how fast his car was going at the point of impact? I was turning left, and the guy smashed into my passenger side as I crossed his lane. I would say the angle at which he hit me was about 110 degrees, since I wasn’t quite at 90 degrees to him yet. I was just starting to turn, so I was going no more than 5 mph. I ended up 83 feet away. There were no tire tracks at the point of impact, so my car must have gone airborne! This seems like a physics problem, and I have contacted some physics students, but they are students and are not interested. I think it should be possible to calculate it, but I don’t know physics. Please help! My car was totaled. The other guy claims he was going 35 mph, but given how far my car went, that just doesn’t make sense.





The thing that I'm interested in more than anything else is what else is needed to accurately model this event. This person didn't describe if his car skidded all the way till it stopped, or simply roll away. He also didn't say how far his car was "airborne".

This is why an investigator will need to actually look at the scene itself to get a more complete set of parameters. People who are involved in this usually do not realize what are all the necessary information that are needed to reconstruct the event.


Zz.



Bacteria Lowers Mosquito-Transmission of Malaria, Dengue


Mosquitoes that harbor a soil microbe called have a harder time catching dengue virus and the malarial parasite. Christopher Intagliata reports. October 31, 2014 | |


The human microbiome is the community of tiny organisms that live on us and inside us. These critters play vital roles in our health. They , , even . But if we stop the navel gazing--literally, because some --there's a whole lot to be found in the microbiomes of other organisms too.


Take the pesky mosquito. A few years back, scientists found a soil microbe called living in the guts of mosquitoes in Panama. Upon further study, the researchers say this mosquito-occupant could be a remarkably versatile weapon to fight malaria and dengue fever. Because shortens the lifespan of disease-transmitting mosquito species that harbor it; and kills their larvae outright. It also reduces mosquitoes' ability to catch the dengue virus, or the malarial parasite; and it kills both pathogens in the lab. Those findings are in the journal . [Jose Luis Ramirez et al.: ]


The researchers say this strain could someday guide the development of new drugs. Or serve as a more environmentally-friendly stand-in for pesticides. But they also say that, as with many disease-control strategies, there's no one silver bullet. Drugs, vaccines, and education will still be crucial to keeping mosquito-borne killers in check. Along with good old vector control: in this case, fighting bugs with bugs.


—Christopher Intagliata



How to Turn Around Troubled Teens

Mike S. (not his real name) was 13 years old when one of us (Lilienfeld) met him on an inpatient psychiatric ward, where Lilienfeld was a clinical psychology intern. Mike was articulate and charming, and he radiated warmth. Yet this initial impression belied a disturbing truth. For several years Mike had been in serious trouble at school for lying, cheating and assaulting classmates. He was verbally abusive toward his biological mother, who lived alone with him. Mike tortured and even killed cats and bragged about experiencing no guilt over these actions. He was finally brought to the hospital in the mid-1980s, after he was caught trying to con railroad workers into giving him dynamite, which he intended to use to blow up his school. According to psychiatry's standard guidebook, the (now in its fifth edition), Mike's diagnosis was conduct disorder, a condition marked by a pattern of antisocial and perhaps criminal behavior emerging in childhood or adolescence.


Psychologists have long struggled with how to treat adolescents with conduct disorder, or juvenile delinquency, as the condition is sometimes called when it comes to the attention of the courts. Given that the annual number of juvenile court cases is about 1.2 million, these efforts are of great societal importance. One set of approaches involves “getting tough” with delinquents by exposing them to strict discipline and attempting to shock them out of future crime. These efforts are popular, in part because they quench the public's understandable thirst for law and order. Yet scientific studies indicate that these interventions are ineffective and can even backfire. Better ways to turn around troubled teens involve teaching them how to engage in positive behaviors rather than punishing them for negative ones.


Even so, research has yielded at best mixed support for boot camps. In a 2010 review of 69 controlled studies, criminologists Benjamin Meade and Benjamin Steiner, both then at the University of South Carolina, revealed that such programs produced little or no overall improvement in offender recidivism. For reasons that are unclear, some of them reduced rates of delinquency, but others led to higher rates. Boot camps that incorporated psychological treatments, such as substance abuse counseling or psychotherapy, seemed somewhat more effective than those that did not offer such therapies, although the number of studies was too small to draw firm conclusions.


Another method is “Scared Straight,” which became popular following an Academy Award–winning documentary (), which was filmed in a New Jersey state prison in 1978. Typically these programs bring delinquents and other high-risk teens into prisons to interact with adult inmates, who talk bluntly about the harsh realities of life behind bars. Making adolescents keenly aware of prison life is supposed to deter them from criminal careers. Yet the research on these interventions is not encouraging. In a 2003 meta-analysis (quantitative review) of nine controlled studies of Scared Straight programs, criminal justice researcher Anthony Petrosino, now at the research agency WestEd, and his colleagues showed that these treatments backfired, boosting the odds of offending by 60 to 70 percent.


The verdict for other get-tough interventions, such as juvenile transfer laws, which allow teens who commit especially heinous offenses to be tried as adults, is no more promising. In a 2010 summary, psychologist Richard Redding of Chapman University found higher recidivism rates among transferred adolescent offenders than among nontransferred ones.


Perils of Punishment


What is more, adolescents with conduct disorder often enter treatment angry and alienated, harboring feelings of resentment toward authority. Get-tough programs may fuel these emotions, boosting teens' propensity to rebel against parents and teachers. Finally, some programs may inadvertently provide adolescents with role models for bad behavior. For example, some of the at-risk teens exposed to prisoners in Scared Straight programs may perceive them as cool and worth emulating.


These results show that merely imposing harsh discipline on young offenders or frightening them is unlikely to help them refrain from problematic behavior. Instead teens must learn enduring tools—including better social skills, ways to communicate with parents and peers, and anger management techniques—that help them avoid future aggression. Several effective interventions do just that, including cognitive-behavior therapy, a method intended to change maladaptive thinking patterns and behaviors, and multisystemic therapy, in which parents, schools and communities develop programs to reinforce positive behaviors. Another well-supported method, aimed at improving behavior in at-risk children younger than eight years, is parent-child interaction therapy. Parents are coached by therapists in real time to respond to a child's behavior in ways that strengthen the parent-child bond and provide incentives for cooperation [see by Ingrid Wickelgren; , March/April 2014].


The negative data on get-tough programs remind us that we should be wary of our subjective impressions of strategies that simply seem right or that we feel ought to work. Although we lost track of Mike S., we now know that a concerted effort to teach him more adaptive behaviors would have been more likely to put him on a productive path than would any attempt to scare him straight.



Thursday, October 30, 2014

Fan-mail Friday

Over the summer, I decided it would be fun to look back through all the mail kids sent me during the 2014-2015 school year. I've picked out some of my favorites and will be posting one every Friday. They truly are inspiring.




Maine Nurse Defies State Ebola Quarantine, Leaves Home

A nurse in Maine has vowed not to be bullied by politicians and is threatening to sue the state over an Ebola quarantine she calls unscientifically sound



October 30, 2014


|

(Reuters) - A nurse in Maine vowing not to be bullied by politicians and threatening to sue the state over an Ebola quarantine she calls unscientifically sound, defied the order and left her home for a bike ride on Thursday, according to television images.


Kaci Hickox left her home in Fort Kent to take a morning bicycle ride with her boyfriend, MSNBC and other networks reported. Hickox, 33, who tested negative for Ebola after returning from treating patients in West Africa, said that she plans to take the issue to court if the state did not lift the quarantine by Thursday.


(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Scott Malone)


Wednesday, October 29, 2014

Does the Universe Violate the Laws of Thermodynamics?

See Inside

Total energy must be conserved. Every student of physics learns this fundamental law. The trouble is, it does not apply to the universe as a whole


By

Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. This principle, called conservation of energy, is one of our most cherished laws of physics. It governs every part of our lives: the heat it takes to warm up a cup of coffee; the chemical reactions that produce oxygen in the leaves of trees; the orbit of Earth around the sun; the food we need to keep our hearts beating. We cannot live without eating, cars do not run without fuel, and perpetual-motion machines are just a mirage. So when an experiment seems to violate the law of energy conservation, we are rightfully suspicious. What happens when our observations seem to contradict one of science's most deeply held notions: that energy is always conserved?


Skip for a moment outside our Earthly sphere and consider the wider universe. Almost all of our information about outer space comes in the form of light, and one of light's key features is that it gets redshifted—its electromagnetic waves get stretched—as it travels from distant galaxies through our ever expanding universe, in accordance with Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity. But the longer the wavelength, the lower the energy. Thus, inquisitive minds ask: When light is redshifted by the expansion of the universe, where does its energy go? Is it lost, in violation of the conservation principle?



*You must have purchased this issue or have a qualifying subscription to access this content


How Do Animals Become Zombies? - Instant Egghead

October 27, 2014


It may sound like something straight out of a horror movie, but many animals can come under the zombie-like control of parasites. So what about humans? Scientific American editor Katherine Harmon fills us in on the ghoulish side of Nature.


Showing 16451


Scientific American Back To School

Back to School Sale!


12 Digital Issues + 4 Years of Archive Access just $19.99


> X


Email this Article


X


Lonesome George, the Last of His Kind, Strikes His Final Pose

Tucked beside fossils of long-gone gigantic sloths and knee-high horses stands a newcomer to the American Museum of Natural History’s extinction parade: Lonesome George, the last known Pinta Island giant tortoise.


For four decades the 100-year-old reptile served as a conservation icon on Ecuador’s Galápagos Archipelago. His subspecies, hunted for meat and tortoise oil, all but vanished in the 1900s. George was its only survivor, and despite several attempts to get him to reproduce with giant tortoises from similar subspecies, on June 24, 2012. Now, what remains of Lonesome George’s legacy is a lifelike mount at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City. Designed by an expert team of taxidermists, the display depicts George at his most majestic; with neck outstretched and shell polished.


Serendipity brought him to the museum. On the same morning that Fausto Llerena, George’s handler since 1983, found the tortoise sprawled out dead in his pen, a congregation of conservationists had just arrived to Santa Cruz Island for a citizen science workshop. Santa Cruz Island, where George drew millions of visitors over his 40-year tenure, is one of four inhabited islands in the Galápagos chain; the other more than three-dozen islands and islets are untouched wilderness preserves. When Llerena informed the of George’s passing, they shared the sad news with their guests, many of whom began to cry. For , a chief conservation scientist at the AMNH who arrived on the island that day, the next 24 hours were filled with disbelief. “We just witnessed extinction,” she says.


Galápagos tortoises can live up to 150 years, so George’s death came unexpectedly. The park had made no prior arrangements. “It’s always hypothetical until you’re in the middle of it,” Sterling says. “Then suddenly you’ve got this big weight on your shoulders.”


Sterling and the other conservationists, many of whom were members of the , shifted gears from conducting citizen science to making postmortem arrangements. A veterinarian was called to conduct the necropsy; after splitting George’s shell in half with a chainsaw it was determined he had died of natural causes. Next the group needed to stabilize George’s carcass before the 100-degree Fahrenheit tropical heat could rot his remains. For that, they needed plastic freezer wrap and a refrigerator. So the group made frantic calls to local village hardware stores on Santa Cruz Island.


>> Click here to see a slideshow of Lonesome George's final adventure


The hardware stores were out of plastic freezer wrap, and it would take two weeks to get more. When the team explained that the supplies were for Lonesome George, employees sniffed out some freezer plastic at a local pig farm. The group then wrapped every centimeter of George’s 1.5-meter-long frame to keep him frozen and thwart freezer burn; they had to protect each individual toe to prevent it from breaking off in the refrigerator. For Sterling, the process was “exciting and terrifying.”


After 36 hours, the bulky, 75-kilogram tortoise was put in a large freezer, safely wrapped and mummified. Meanwhile, word of his death went viral. The Galápagos Conservancy was flooded with e-mails from impassioned fans suggesting next steps. Some recommended burying Lonesome George on his home island. Others wanted to parade him from country to country like a rock star on a world tour. One letter even suggested barbecuing his remains for a celebratory “ingesting George” feast.


Members of both the conservancy and the Galápagos National Park System decided the best option was to preserve George via taxidermy; that way, the thinking went, George could continue to herald conservation efforts even in death. But the restoration job would require a very special taxidermist.


George Dante was tinkering in his office at , a taxidermy firm in Woodland Park, N.J., when Steve Quinn, a senior diorama artist from the AMNH, called. “I could not believe what I was hearing,” Dante says. “Everything was moving in slow-motion. I remember trying to process the fact that George had passed away and this was the end of a species. And then this honor, that they’re asking me if I’m interested in doing this.”


Sterling had recommended Dante for the job. “After I had my 24 hours of sadness and self-reflection, I realized the museum could and had the resources to make a difference,” she says. Dante had done the taxidermy restoration work on and other creatures for the museum’s North American Mammal Hall in 2012. Preserving George would be his biggest challenge since that project.


Acting on Dante’s instructions, the park’s carpenters and mechanics built a custom box made of hardwood tree bark to ship George from the Galápagos to Dante’s New Jersey office. Getting the tortoise there would require special permits from Ecuador’s wildlife agencies, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecuador’s presidential office and other authorities. It ended up taking nine months for George to be cleared for travel. In the meantime all Dante could do was cross his fingers while the tortoise sat in a freezer on an island with little infrastructure and frequent electrical blackouts.


On March 10, 2013, the morning of Lonesome George’s departure arrived. , a conservationist from the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, had flown down to chaperone the corpse. Gibbs had worked with George for a number of years but says that the tortoise had never liked him. Gibbs’s job was to draw blood samples from George, so every time he would approach the tortoise, George would recede into his shell.


Before dawn Gibbs helped load the frozen tortoise into his box and then onto a truck that took them via ferry to the airport. Along the way, people asked what was in Gibbs’s 225-kilogram box. When he told them it carried Lonesome George, they would touch the box as if it were the casket of a loved one. Some people cried; many offered to accompany George on his journey. “I could actually see in the eyes of people that they really believed in the importance of this,” Gibbs says. “It personalized the meaning of extinction for me.”


On March 11, after 28 hours of travel, Gibbs delivered George to Dante in New Jersey. Opening the hardwood box was a nail-biter: What if the carcass had thawed en route? But after Dante pried the box apart he found that George’s remains were still fully frozen.


Dante defrosted the corpse. After George’s body thawed he measured every centimeter of the tortoise before molding a replica of the body. He filled the mold with foam, which would eventually become the base on which he would add a water-based clay to create George’s features. On top of that clay he would stretch out George’s skin—intact in one whole piece. His biggest hurdle was working on a species that had never been mounted before. Not surprisingly, taxidermy-supply companies do not make parts for extinct giant tortoises. “The beauty is that there’s no handbook on how to do it,” he says.


Dante was well aware he was working on what he had dubbed “the world’s pet.” As such, he knew there was no room for error. Every centimeter had to be scientifically accurate, from his saddle-back shell to the missing toenail on his left front foot. “We couldn’t just look at this as a project of mounting a Galápagos tortoise.” Dante says. “We are re-creating this character.”


He checked hundreds of pictures to fashion every wrinkle in George’s skin. He dashed green stains around George’s mouth and neck to make it appear as if the tortoise had just finished grazing. And he had a glass company create the world’s first pair of custom-made glass tortoise eyeballs for George, which meant visiting a local zoo to observe the intricate colors of a live tortoise’s eyes. When it came time for a pose, Dante consulted Fausto Llerena, who was a part of the group that first found George and the man who discovered he had died. Llerena advised Dante to portray George in a familiar stance, with his neck outstretched in dominance and yet with his tail tucked submissively. Llerena, who is also a well-known wood carver, sent Dante a hand-carved wooden tortoise as a sign of gratitude for restoring his friend of 40 years. “This is my Oscar,” Dante says of the softball-size carving.


On September 18, 2014, after 500 hours of labor conducted over more than a year, Dante was finally ready to present George to the museum and the people who helped bring him there. Among the congregation at George’s unveiling were several people who were also present for his death, including Gibbs and Sterling. They were all pleasantly surprised with Dante’s work. “You could see the look in his eye, and you could see the pose,” Sterling says. “He brought Lonesome George back to life.”


Surrounded by other species lost to time, George looked a little less lonesome. But the difference between him and his neighboring specimens was not lost on anyone who attended the unveiling. The other animals in the hall were driven to extinction by changing climates. George and his kind disappeared because of man.




Remembering Polio Vaccine Developer Jonas Salk a Century after His Birth

Routine clinical use of his vaccine forestalled the paralysis and death brought by the dreaded illness


October 28, 2014 | |

Jonas Salk Congressional Gold Medal (front), awarded to Salk in 1955


More In This Article


The first vaccine against polio, developed by Jonas Salk in 1954 while he was at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, registered a success rate of only 60 to 90 percent. Yet the annual incidence of polio in the U.S. quickly and dramatically fell from tens of thousands of cases to a few dozen in only a few years.


The initial Salk vaccine, a “killed-virus” version, was replaced within a few years by a “live-virus” formulation developed by Albert Sabin of the University of Cincinnati. Since 2000, however, an updated version of the Salk vaccine, safer than the Sabin version, has been the only one given in the U.S. to prevent polio: it is 99 percent effective after three doses. Salk never patented nor made any money from his discovery.


In later life Salk went on to found the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., and in the mid-1980s he started working on an AIDS vaccine. He died in 1995 at the age of 80


Read more:


— Classics digital issue


,” by Jonas Salk. , April 1955 (included in e-book above)



Melting Cave Ice Is Taking Ancient Climate Data with It


Scărişoara Ice Cave, Romania


On a recent visit to Crystal Ice Cave in Idaho, climate and cave researchers had to wade through frigid, knee-deep water to reach the ice formations that give the cave its name. Cavers are good-humored about the hardships of underground exploration, but this water was chilling for more than one reason: it was carrying away some of the very clues they had come to study.


Ice is an invaluable source of information about the earth's past. Pollen trapped in ice from polar ice caps and mountaintop glaciers documents plant life up to 1.5 million years ago, and gas bubbles and water isotopes reveal glimpses of ancient temperatures.


Polar ice samples cannot necessarily reveal what the climate was like in, say, New Mexico or other temperate regions, however. So a decade ago a small group of researchers began meeting to discuss the potential of cave ice, some of which is more than 3,000 years old. Since then, studies have confirmed that cave ice can illuminate some questions about how lower altitudes and latitudes responded to climate swings. But by this summer, when the scientists found themselves wading through the meltwater in Crystal Ice Cave during their biennial workshop, the main question had changed from what the ice could tell them to how to retrieve enough before it disappeared.


Thus far researchers have not won much funding for long-term studies of ice caves. Part of the reason is that obtaining a sample is a massive, expensive effort, requiring intense drilling, helicopters and refrigerated vans. And geochemist Zoltán Kern of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest notes that he understands funders' qualms because scientists have not yet figured out how to convert complicated cave ice data into tidy climate records. But this much is clear, says George Veni, director of the National Cave and Karst Research Institute in Carlsbad, N.M.: before the ice melts, “the main thing is to try and collect as much of it as possible.”


Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Behind the Books: Thinking About Nonfiction Styles

According to CCSS, there are four types of nonfiction—literary, expository, persuasive, and procedural. But traditionally, writers have used terms like these as labels for various nonfiction writing styles.

I like the word “styles” because it implies some sort of craft, some sort of decision-making process on the part of the writer. When reading a nonfiction text, it’s important for students to think about the author’s purpose and how that purpose influenced the way he/she chose to present facts, ideas, and/or true stories. Remembering that the author is a person with a distinct point of view will help young readers think critically and spot potential biases. And that’s not all. Recognizing how other authors craft their manuscripts can help young writers communicate their own thoughts and ideas more effectively.


Okay, I’ll get down off my soapbox now.


If you google “nonfiction writing styles,” you’ll pull up a gazillion different articles. Some of the ideas in them overlap, and some don’t. Like I said last week, classifying nonfiction can be a messy process.


After reading dozens of articles on this topic and thinking about the children’s nonfiction books being produced today as well as the kinds of writing that twenty-first century learners should be able to craft, I see these three style categories—expository, narrative, and persuasive.


Expository writing explains, describes, and/or informs. That’s the author’s purpose in crafting the piece.


Narrative writing reads like a story because the author has worked hard to create that effect.


Persuasive writing argues a position because the author wants to convince the reader of something.


I’ll be talking more about each of these three style categories over the next few weeks. Stay tuned.



Remembering Jonas Salk on the 100th Anniversary of Polio Vaccine Developer’s Birth

Routine clinical use of his vaccine forestalled the paralysis and death brought by the dreaded illness


October 28, 2014 | |

Jonas Salk Congressional Gold Medal (front), awarded to Salk in 1955


More In This Article


The first vaccine against polio, developed by Jonas Salk in 1954 while he was at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, registered a success rate of only 60 to 90 percent. Yet the incidence of polio in the U.S. quickly and dramatically fell from an average 25,000 cases to a few dozen in only a few years.


The initial Salk vaccine, a “killed-virus” version, was replaced within a few years by a “live-virus” formulation developed by Albert Sabin of the University of Cincinnati. Since 2000, however, an updated version of the Salk vaccine, safer than the Sabin version, has been the only one given in the U.S. to prevent polio: it is 99 percent effective after three doses. Salk never patented nor made any money from his discovery.


In later life Salk went on to found the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, Calif., and in the mid-1980s he started working on an AIDS vaccine. He died in 1995 at the age of 80


Read more:


— Classics digital issue


,” by Jonas Salk. , April 1955 (included in e-book above)



Melting Cave Ice Is Taking Ancient Climate Data with It


Scărişoara Ice Cave, Romania


On a recent visit to Crystal Ice Cave in Idaho, climate and cave researchers had to wade through frigid, knee-deep water to reach the ice formations that give the cave its name. Cavers are good-humored about the hardships of underground exploration, but this water was chilling for more than one reason: it was carrying away some of the very clues they had come to study.


Ice is an invaluable source of information about the earth's past. Pollen trapped in ice from polar ice caps and mountaintop glaciers documents plant life up to 1.5 million years ago, and gas bubbles and water isotopes reveal glimpses of ancient temperatures.


Polar ice samples cannot necessarily reveal what the climate was like in, say, New Mexico or other temperate regions, however. So a decade ago a small group of researchers began meeting to discuss the potential of cave ice, some of which is more than 3,000 years old. Since then, studies have confirmed that cave ice can illuminate some questions about how lower altitudes and latitudes responded to climate swings. But by this summer, when the scientists found themselves wading through the meltwater in Crystal Ice Cave during their biennial workshop, the main question had changed from what the ice could tell them to how to retrieve enough before it disappeared.


Thus far researchers have not won much funding for long-term studies of ice caves. Part of the reason is that obtaining a sample is a massive, expensive effort, requiring intense drilling, helicopters and refrigerated vans. And geochemist Zoltán Kern of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest notes that he understands funders' qualms because scientists have not yet figured out how to convert complicated cave ice data into tidy climate records. But this much is clear, says George Veni, director of the National Cave and Karst Research Institute in Carlsbad, N.M.: before the ice melts, “the main thing is to try and collect as much of it as possible.”


Online Personalization Means Prices Are Tailored To You, Too


Christo Wilson, a computer scientist at Northeastern University, says prices online are "super subjective" and vary according to your past clicks and purchases, or whether you're shopping on a mobile phone. October 28, 2014 | |


"If you were to walk into a store and they were offering better prices for less affluent people there would be a revolt, right? No one would stand for this." Christo Wilson, a computer scientist at Northeastern University. But on the Internet, he says, when it comes to pricing. "It is super subjective. Everything can be personalized."


Wilson and his colleagues analyzed just how personal online shopping can get. They compared the search results of 300 real-world users to searches by cookie-free, fake accounts on 16 major e-commerce sites. Turns out half the sites personalized search results, based on who was searching. Especially travel sites. Expedia and Hotels.com prioritized more expensive hotels for certain users; and Priceline skewed search results based on past purchases.


But Wilson's favorite example of variable online pricing was HomeDepot.com - where shoppers on mobile devices tend to be offered much more expensive items. "It's like you went on your desktop and you search for a table and they give you a plastic folding table; but you search from your phone and they give you a mahogany dining room table." The researchers will present their findings on in Vancouver. [Aniko Hannak et al.: ]


For all you comparison shoppers, here's Wilson's advice on how to beat the bots. "Do the search from your desktop, as you normally would. You should also do the search from an incognito or a private window. You should also then do the search from your mobile, or your tablet. And then if you're really paranoid, you should also talk to a friend or a family member or friend, and have them also do the search." We’ve gone from brick and mortar… to click and be mortified.


— Christopher Intagliata




Apple Pay Perturbs Prying Personal Prospectors

Law enforcement agencies and retailers such as Walmart and Best Buy balk at Apple's operating system and payment app privacy efforts. Larry Greenemeier reports October 28, 2014 | |

Apple’s efforts to improve your have met with surprisingly strong resistance from companies and agencies that want your info. Seems that confidentiality hampers efforts to track —and bad guys.The controversy revolves around what’s called Apple Pay. By employing the newly released payment system, users of the latest i-devices can now buy things without flashing a credit or debit card. Google’s offered a similar digital wallet for years, but Apple’s version will not collect transaction info or store card numbers on your device.Many retailers have bought in to Apple Pay. It promises to be more secure than plastic, and when it comes to data security. But other outfits, including retail giants Walmart and Best Buy, have rejected the Apple Pay technology because it prevents them from tracking customer-purchasing preferences. They’re working on a rival smartphone payment app called CurrentC.Meanwhile, law enforcement has over iOS 8, which passcode-protects photos and other info on the newest iPhones and iPads. Apple doesn’t store the passcodes, even if there’s a warrant. Google will offer in an upcoming version of Android.Apple exerted its will on the music and publishing industries. We’ll see if the company has the clout to now move the needle on privacy.—Larry Greenemeier[]



Brain Stimulation May Alleviate Severe Depression, but Full Recovery Takes Time

This blog is the last in a series of guest posts on technology and the brain to celebrate Scientific American Mind’s 10-year anniversary. The magazine’s specialNovember/December issue similarly highlights the interface between code and thought in profiling a future, more digital YOU.


I have been a practicing psychiatrist at the Cleveland Clinic since 1989. Back in 1999, my colleagues and I began looking into a technology called deep brain stimulation (DBS) as a treatment for psychiatric disorders. Initially we wanted to see if DBS, in which surgeons implant a 1-milllimeter thin electrode through the skull to stimulate a specific region of the brain, could help people with very severe obsessive compulsive disorder.


These patients needed serious help. Many of them couldn’t leave the house; they spent many hours per day on rituals and compulsive behaviors, and were completely disabled. Placed in a specific area of the brain, a DBS electrode delivers constant low intensity stimulation designed to interrupt neural circuits thought to be involved in the particular disorder. Obsessive compulsive disorder is thought to involve too much activity in a brain circuit involving the orbitofrontal cortex, striatum and thalamus. Studies had shown that surgically removing parts of this circuit improved symptoms of the illness so we wanted to see if implanting an electrode in this circuit—we would aim for the ventral striatum—could improve their condition as well.


Indeed, we found that about half of the severely afflicted individuals we treated did get significant better after the electrode implantation. In addition, however, we noticed that the depression often present in these patients also improved significantly—leading us to consider using DBS in the same region for patients with severe intractable depression. In the following years, open-label studies in which researchers implanted electrodes in the ventral striatum and other brain regions showed that more than half of these very seriously affected patients get significantly better after the procedure.



Courtesy of Dave Gingrich via Flickr.


That success rate does not tell the whole story, however. In studies of DBS in depression, success is generally measured by the lessening or lifting of symptoms such as sadness, low energy, insomnia, poor appetite, poor concentration and suicidal thinking. But declines in those signs do not necessarily provide a full measure of recovery, if by that we mean a smooth reintegration into life. To me, the most amazing part of watching these patients get over severe depression after DBS is that some would re-engage in life quickly upon improvement of their mood while others would sometimes take years to achieve a relatively normal quality of life. After years of living with severe depression, it appeared that a period of “relearning to live normally” was required. In addition, the patient was not the only one who had to adjust to a “new normal;” family and friends did, too. For these patients, fixing an abnormal biological circuit using the latest medical technology is just the start. They also have to rebuild their relationships and their place in the world… often struggling with the confidence required to perform typical activities of daily life. Returning to work, re-engaging in relationships, or even cooking on a regular basis requires a certain resilience and mental stamina that was long absent during their depression.


For example, one patient of mine, a 46-year-old whom I will call Mary, had more than a 20-year history of severe depression with her most recent episode lasting over six years. She had to quit her job as a school teacher, and instead simply stayed home spending most hours ruminating about how badly she felt. Married with two children, she went from being the primary caretaker of the family to depending on the family to take care of themselves while she existed in increasing isolation. She had frequent thoughts of suicide and tried to take her own life several times with medication overdoses. To reduce her suicidal thoughts, she received electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) on repeated occasions. ECT induces seizures and can be an effective treatment for severe depression. Mary was initially helped by the treatments, but they eventually waned in their effectiveness. She also experienced some short-term memory loss, likely as a result of ECT. Thus, she was left without many options to treat her illness.


Mary’s psychiatrist referred her to the Cleveland Clinic for possible treatment with DBS. Within three months of her surgery, she felt a significant improvement in her mood, energy, interest in favorite activities and concentration. She was able to re-engage with friends and family to a significant degree. Once again, she began traveling, engaging in crafts and socializing. When I saw her, it seemed obvious that she was a different person.


Still, Mary was plagued by worries that her depression would return, causing her to be afraid to re-engage fully with friends or return to work. Certain mildly stressful life events such as an illness in her child or a minor financial issue would paralyze her with fear that the depression was coming back. All individuals have a bad day once in a while. For Mary, a bad day could send her spiraling into ruminative worry. She lacked confidence in a sustained recovery. One of these events led to a recurrence of her depressive symptoms and required a brief hospital stay.


Only three to five years after her surgery did she finally feel free of the depression. Her work with a therapist during those years gradually brought about the confidence and resilience necessary to maintain recovery. She now frequently travels and is quite active with her family. Others in her life note a return of her upbeat and confident personality. Although she seemed like a totally different person within a few months of starting DBS to me, she only felt comfortable as a different person after several years.


Another patient, a 45-year-old mother of three, had severe depression for about 10 years. This woman, whom I will call Joanne, would enter the hospital many times a year, often for weeks at a time, because of pervasive suicidal thinking involving a desire to overdose on medication. When not in the hospital, she would spend most waking hours in her bed, due to ever-present despair, low energy and suicidal thinking. She was unable to care for her children, clean her house or go to her job as an administrative assistant. Her husband and children took over the cooking, cleaning and washing.


After many years on various medications, in psychotherapy, and attempts at ECT, Joanne’s psychiatrist referred her for DBS. Within several weeks of starting stimulation, her mood improved noticeably. Joanne smiled more and more often ventured out of her bedroom. Yet she seemed to resist a return to a normal life replete with a variety of tasks, conversations and activities. She would say it felt overwhelming to have to function again. It was easier in some ways to remain immobile and removed from much of life. She also feared a return of her illness. “What if I start to do well and the depression comes back again? I don’t think I could take it,” she said.


Her family had also learned to live essentially without her. After 10 years, you can’t just turn back the clock and pretend depression never happened. In different family members there were elements of anger, guilt and resentment. Children who spent most of their formative years without a functional mother could not easily let that go. Certainly, Joanne felt guilty about not having been there for her kids or husband for a good part of her life.


Over the next nine years the wounds began to heal. Her husband began to believe that her return to normal would be sustained. The fear of her committing suicide gradually went away. Trust in her returned.


Now, Joanne is very active in the lives of her grandchildren, providing them with a loving environment and a solid role model. They spend weekends and vacations with her. The anger and resentment have dwindled away. Although psychotherapy probably sped the process of recovery, my sense is that the process just took time. Time to feel that mom was stable enough to trust her. Time to heal some of the emotional wounds. Time for the patient to feel confident that she would never again retreat to her room, or a hospital. Time for a marriage to overcome the emotional distance present for so many years. Such a process cannot be rushed.


This blog isn’t solely about depression and DBS. All severe mental illnesses that have left individuals disabled and family dynamics altered may create both a need for immediate treatment such as DBS and a plan for long-term rebuilding of lives. As we search for, and rely upon, immediate technological fixes for psychiatric conditions, it is important to remember that reversing abnormal brain circuits may not be sufficient for the patient to return to “normal.” A sort of rehabilitation must take place on the part of the patient and family. Psychotherapy can certainly be of value here. On some occasions, though, it just takes time. Clinicians must be willing to understand and endure this with the patient and family. Medicine continues to pursue briefer and less costly treatments for our disorders. Such a short-term focus may leave many patients with unrealistic expectations and a lack of emotional support for the road ahead. I hope we do not get so enthusiastic about technological cures for mental illness that we lose perspective on what it takes for these patients truly recover.


Other blogs in this series:


>>”Expert Cancer Care May Soon Be Everywhere, Thanks to Watson”


>>”A Hubble Telescope for the Mind”


>>”Can Video Games Diagnose Cognitive Deficits?”


>>”Giving the Brain a Buzz: The Ultimate in Self-Help or a Dangerous Distraction?”


>>”Simply Shining a Light Can Reveal the Brain’s Structure”


>>”In the Future, Your Therapy and Education Will Be Tailored to Your Brain”


Evidence Builds for Dark Matter Explosions at the Milky Way’s Core

Unexplained gamma rays streaming from the galactic center may have been produced by dark matter, but more mundane explanations are also possible October 28, 2014 | |Gamma-ray map of Milky Way core


This Fermi map of the Milky Way center shows an overabundance of gamma-rays (red indicates the greatest number) that cannot be explained by conventional sources.


So far, dark matter has evaded scientists’ best attempts to find it. Astronomers know the invisible stuff dominates our universe and tugs gravitationally on regular matter, but they do not know what it is made of. , however, suspicious gamma-ray light radiating from the Milky Way’s core—where dark matter is thought to be especially dense—has intrigued researchers. Some wonder if the rays might have been emitted in explosions caused by colliding particles of dark matter. Now a new gamma-ray signal, in combination with those already detected, offers further evidence that this might be the case.One possible explanation for dark matter is that it is made of theorized “weakly interacting massive particles,” or WIMPs. Every WIMP is thought to be both matter and antimatter, so when two of them meet they should annihilate on contact, as matter and antimatter do. These blasts would create gamma-ray light, which is what astronomers see in abundance at the center of our galaxy in data from the . The explosions could also create cosmic-ray particles—high-energy electrons and positrons (the antimatter counterparts of electrons)—which would then speed out from the heart of the Milky Way and sometimes collide with particles of starlight, giving them a boost of energy that would bump them up into the gamma-ray range. For the first time scientists have now detected light that matches predictions for this second process, called inverse Compton scattering, which should produce gamma rays that are more spread out over space and come in a different range of energies than those released directly by dark matter annihilation.“It looks pretty clear from their work that an additional inverse Compton component of gamma rays is present,” says Dan Hooper, an astrophysicist at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory who was not involved in the study, but who originally pointed out that a dark matter signal might be present in the Fermi telescope data. “Such a component could come from the same dark matter that makes the primary all of these years.” University of California, Irvine scientists Anna Kwa and Kevork Abazajian presented the October 23 at the Fifth International Fermi Symposium in Nagoya, Japan and submitted their paper to .None of the intriguing gamma-ray light is a smoking gun for dark matter. Other astrophysical processes, such as spinning stars called pulsars, can create both types of signal. “You can make models that replicate all this with astrophysics,” Abazajian says. “But the case for dark matter is the easiest, and there’s more and more evidence that keeps piling up.”The has long been cautious about drawing conclusions on dark matter from their data. But at last week’s symposium, the group presented its own analysis of the unexplained gamma-ray light and concluded that although multiple hypotheses fit the data, dark matter fits best. “That’s huge news because it’s the first time they’ve acknowledged that,” Abazajian says. Simona Murgia, an astrophysicist at the University of California, Irvine and a member of the Fermi collaboration’s galactic-center analysis team, presented the team’s findings. She says the complexity of the galactic center makes it difficult to know for sure how the excess of gamma rays arose and whether or not the light could come from mundane “background” sources. “It is a very interesting claim,” she says of Abazajian’s analysis. “However, detection of extended excesses in this region of the sky is complicated by our incomplete understanding of the background.”The dark matter interpretation would look more likely if astronomers could find similar evidence of WIMP annihilation in other galaxies, such as the two dozen or so dwarf galaxies that orbit the Milky Way. “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and I think a convincing claim of discovery would probably require a corresponding signal in another location—or by a non-astrophysical experiment—as well as the galactic center,” says Massachusetts Institute of Technology astrophysicist Tracy Slatyer, who has also studied the Fermi data from the Milky Way’s center.Non-astrophysical experiments include the handful of so-called on Earth, which aim to catch WIMPs on the extremely rare occasions when they bump into atoms of normal matter. So far, however, none of these has found any evidence for dark matter. Instead they have steadily whittled away at the tally of possible types of WIMPs that could exist.Other orbiting experiments, such as the Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer (AMS) on the International Space Station, which detects cosmic rays, have also failed to find convincing proof of dark matter. In fact, the AMS results seem to conflict with the most basic explanations linking dark matter to the Fermi observations. “Most people would agree that there is something rather unexpected happening at the galactic center, and it would be tremendously exciting if it turns out to be a dark matter annihilation signal,” says Christoph Weniger of the University of Amsterdam, another astrophysicist who has studied the Milky Way’s core. “But we have to confirm this interpretation by finding corroborating evidence in other independent observations first. Much more work needs to be done.”


African Lions Face Extinction by 2050, Could Gain Endangered Species Act Protection

The African lion () faces the threat of extinction by the year 2050, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director Dan Ashe warned today. The sobering news came as part of the agency’s announcement that it has that African lions receive much-needed protection under the Endangered Species Act.


The decision to list the big cats as threatened—one level below endangered—would allow the U.S. government to provide some level of training and assistance for on-the-ground conservation efforts and restrict the sale of lion parts or hunting trophies into the country or across state lines.


The total population of lions in Africa is currently estimated at about 34,000 animals, down by at least 50 percent from three decades ago. Those numbers, however, tell only part of the story. As Ashe pointed out during a press conference today, about 70 percent of the remaining lions—24,000 cats—live in just 10 “stronghold” regions in southern and eastern Africa. Lions in other regions, , have been almost completely wiped out.


FWS identified three main threats currently facing lions: habitat loss, loss of their prey base to the bushmeat trade, and human-lion conflict. All three threats are inexorably linked. The human population of sub-Saharan Africa is expected to double by the year 2050, which will result in more conversion of habitat to agriculture, more hunting of the wild ungulates the lions depend upon for prey, and more instances of hungry lions attacking livestock and then being killed in retaliation. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), retaliatory or preemptive attacks against lions are the worst threats the species faces. The IUCN lists African lions as a whole as .


Lions do face another major threat: sport hunting. The proposal to protect lions comes in response to a from five conservation groups, who revealed that hunting occurs in 16 of the 20 countries in which lions remain and that the number of lion trophies imported back into the U.S. by American hunters doubled between 1999 and 2008. The official FWS position, however, iterated today by Ashe, is that sports hunting does not contribute to lions being endangered, especially when revenues from these hunts support lion conservation efforts. This is consistent with other hunting-as-conservation positions taken by FWS, including last year’s decision to allow a hunter to into the U.S. for the first time in 33 years.


Still, Jeff Flocken, North American regional director at the International Fund for Animal Welfare—one of the groups backing the original petition—calls the FWS announcement “very significant.” Although Endangered Species Act protection would not block American hunters from traveling to Africa to hunt lions, the proposal does establish a new permitting process that would require any hunters importing lion trophies back to the U.S. to apply for and receive a permit first. These permits, Ashe said, would only be granted if the lion were taken from a scientifically proven hunting program that actually helps lion populations and if the number of lions taken by hunters is sustainable.


Flocken says the new permit process could “quickly and easily” help to minimize the threat that hunters pose to African lions by identifying trophies that come from areas where lions are more at risk—or from in which captive-raised lions are shot in controlled situations. “The permit system will allow the U.S. government to monitor and evaluate the trophies that are coming in,” Flocken says.


Ashe called today’s announcement an opportunity for awareness about the challenges that wildlife faces worldwide as human population dramatically increases. He added that this was a chance for optimism: “We can be successful here,” he said. “We can change the course of events. The U.S. has great experience in wildlife management and hopefully we’ll be able to bring that to bear in working with our African partners.”


The proposal to list lions as threatened will be published in the on October 29, after which the public will have 90 days to submit comments.


Michael Jansen



Pee in This Cup, Doc: Random Drug Tests Should Be Standard for Physicians

See Inside

Enough physicians have substance abuse problems to make random drug testing a needed part of medical practice


Oct 14, 2014 | |

We hold our physicians to high standards because they make life-or-death decisions. Yet when it comes to drug addiction, their behavior can be disturbing. Their overall rates of substance abuse are roughly on par with the rest of the population, at about 10 percent. For prescription drugs, abuse rates for doctors in several specialties are estimated to be even higher—not surprising given their access to addictive medications.


One doctor, who cared for patients while surreptitiously taking large doses of prescription narcotics, wrote in the that “I held patients' lives in my hands when I practiced medicine while high on narcotic drugs for 3½ years. I made errors.” Systematic studies connecting medical errors to drug abuse are hard to do, in part because physicians are skilled at hiding their addiction, yet experts who have culled through case data agree that the danger exists. The inspector general for the U.S. Health and Human Services Department is one of them. Earlier this year he called for mandatory random drug testing for all health care workers with access to drugs.


The idea is a good one. We require such testing of airplane pilots, train conductors, truck drivers and others whose impaired behavior could endanger many lives.


In November, California could become the first state to mandate that crucial level of safety in health care. Voters will consider a ballot initiative that includes a requirement for random drug testing for physicians. The bill may not pass, because it also contains medical malpractice initiatives that face strong opposition. But regardless of what Californians decide, their steps to address drug abuse among health care workers should be emulated across the country.


Expecting health care professionals to police themselves has not worked. One 2010 study published in surveyed almost 2,000 physicians and found that 17 percent said they personally and directly knew an impaired or incompetent physician in the prior three years—yet only 67 percent of those physicians who knew of a colleague's problems reported that person to a relevant authority.


The new California initiative, if made into law, would require the state medical board to oversee a drug- and alcohol-testing program. Random tests would be carried out by doctors' hospitals. Physicians also would be tested when suspected of substance abuse or after an unexpected patient death or serious injury occurred. In addition, doctors would have to report colleagues to the medical board if they suspected drug or alcohol impairment on the job. If doctors tested positive, their medical licenses would be suspended, pending investigation.


We know testing can work, and it may act as an effective deterrent. Since 2004 at Massachusetts General Hospital, a random drug-testing requirement has been in place for anesthesiology residents. During the six years before the program started, there were four substance abuse incidents (uncovered after suspicious behavior prompted for-cause drug testing). But in the 10 years since testing began, not a single resident has tested positive.


Testing, however, should be just the beginning. The goal is not to punish people but to protect patients and get health care providers into treatment so they can safely get back to work. Positive test results should not have to cost physicians their careers: a positive test should lead to a referral to physician health programs that work with state agencies. Most states have such programs, which monitor participants, evaluate needs and direct them to treatment rather than disciplinary action. A 2008 study published in the tracked 802 doctors monitored by these programs for five years and found that about 65 percent remained free of substance abuse. Some physicians asked to continue being monitored as a guard against relapse. The one-out-of-three relapse rate makes it clear that a continued-testing program is essential to help catch backsliders.


There should be better efforts to aid troubled health care workers when they need it and stronger checks to rein in unnecessary access to prescription opioids and to track controlled substances. But such actions will not happen overnight, and drug testing is a good start. If we expect our train and truck drivers to be sober when they clock in, we should expect nothing less from those who follow the Hippocratic credo to, above all, do no harm.


Monday, October 27, 2014

How Do Animals Become Zombies? - Instant Egghead

It may sound like something straight out of a horror movie, but many animals can come under the zombie-like control of parasites. So what about humans? Scientific American editor Katherine Harmon... -- Read more on ScientificAmerican.com

Lonesome George, the Last of His Kind, Strikes His Final Pose

Tucked beside fossils of long-gone gigantic sloths and knee-high horses stands a newcomer to the American Museum of Natural History’s extinction parade: Lonesome George, the last known Pinta Island giant tortoise.


For four decades the 100-year-old reptile served as a conservation icon on Ecuador’s Galápagos Archipelago. His subspecies, hunted for meat and tortoise oil, all but vanished in the 1900s. George was its only survivor, and despite several attempts to get him to reproduce with giant tortoises from similar subspecies, on June 24, 2012. Now, what remains of Lonesome George’s legacy is a lifelike mount at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City. Designed by an expert team of taxidermists, the display depicts George at his most majestic; with neck outstretched and shell polished.


Serendipity brought him to the museum. On the same morning that Fausto Llerena, George’s handler since 1983, found the tortoise sprawled out dead in his pen, a congregation of conservationists had just arrived to Santa Cruz Island for a citizen science workshop. Santa Cruz Island, where George drew millions of visitors over his 40-year tenure, is one of four inhabited islands in the Galápagos chain; the other more than three-dozen islands and islets are untouched wilderness preserves. When Llerena informed the of George’s passing, they shared the sad news with their guests, many of whom began to cry. For , a chief conservation scientist at the AMNH who arrived on the island that day, the next 24 hours were filled with disbelief. “We just witnessed extinction,” she says.


Galápagos tortoises can live up to 150 years, so George’s death came unexpectedly. The park had made no prior arrangements. “It’s always hypothetical until you’re in the middle of it,” Sterling says. “Then suddenly you’ve got this big weight on your shoulders.”


Sterling and the other conservationists, many of whom were members of the , shifted gears from conducting citizen science to making postmortem arrangements. A veterinarian was called to conduct the necropsy; after splitting George’s shell in half with a chainsaw it was determined he had died of natural causes. Next the group needed to stabilize George’s carcass before the 100-degree Fahrenheit tropical heat could rot his remains. For that, they needed plastic freezer wrap and a refrigerator. So the group made frantic calls to local village hardware stores on Santa Cruz Island.


>> Click here to see a slideshow of Lonesome George's final adventure


The hardware stores were out of plastic freezer wrap, and it would take two weeks to get more. When the team explained that the supplies were for Lonesome George, employees sniffed out some freezer plastic at a local pig farm. The group then wrapped every centimeter of George’s 1.5-meter-long frame to keep him frozen and thwart freezer burn; they had to protect each individual toe to prevent it from breaking off in the refrigerator. For Sterling, the process was “exciting and terrifying.”


After 36 hours, the bulky, 75-kilogram tortoise was put in a large freezer, safely wrapped and mummified. Meanwhile, word of his death went viral. The Galápagos Conservancy was flooded with e-mails from impassioned fans suggesting next steps. Some recommended burying Lonesome George on his home island. Others wanted to parade him from country to country like a rock star on a world tour. One letter even suggested barbecuing his remains for a celebratory “ingesting George” feast.


Members of both the conservancy and the Galápagos National Park System decided the best option was to preserve George via taxidermy; that way, the thinking went, George could continue to herald conservation efforts even in death. But the restoration job would require a very special taxidermist.


George Dante was tinkering in his office at , a taxidermy firm in Woodland Park, N.J., when Steve Quinn, a senior diorama artist from the AMNH, called. “I could not believe what I was hearing,” Dante says. “Everything was moving in slow-motion. I remember trying to process the fact that George had passed away and this was the end of a species. And then this honor, that they’re asking me if I’m interested in doing this.”


Sterling had recommended Dante for the job. “After I had my 24 hours of sadness and self-reflection, I realized the museum could and had the resources to make a difference,” she says. Dante had done the taxidermy restoration work on and other creatures for the museum’s North American Mammal Hall in 2012. Preserving George would be his biggest challenge since that project.


Acting on Dante’s instructions, the park’s carpenters and mechanics built a custom box made of hardwood tree bark to ship George from the Galápagos to Dante’s New Jersey office. Getting the tortoise there would require special permits from Ecuador’s wildlife agencies, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecuador’s presidential office and other authorities. It ended up taking nine months for George to be cleared for travel. In the meantime all Dante could do was cross his fingers while the tortoise sat in a freezer on an island with little infrastructure and frequent electrical blackouts.


On March 10, 2013, the morning of Lonesome George’s departure arrived. , a conservationist from the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, had flown down to chaperone the corpse. Gibbs had worked with George for a number of years but says that the tortoise had never liked him. Gibbs’s job was to draw blood samples from George, so every time he would approach the tortoise, George would recede into his shell.


Before dawn Gibbs helped load the frozen tortoise into his box and then onto a truck that took them via ferry to the airport. Along the way, people asked what was in Gibbs’s 225-kilogram box. When he told them it carried Lonesome George, they would touch the box as if it were the casket of a loved one. Some people cried; many offered to accompany George on his journey. “I could actually see in the eyes of people that they really believed in the importance of this,” Gibbs says. “It personalized the meaning of extinction for me.”


On March 11, after 28 hours of travel, Gibbs delivered George to Dante in New Jersey. Opening the hardwood box was a nail-biter: What if the carcass had thawed en route? But after Dante pried the box apart he found that George’s remains were still fully frozen.


Dante defrosted the corpse. After George’s body thawed he measured every centimeter of the tortoise before molding a replica of the body. He filled the mold with foam, which would eventually become the base on which he would add a water-based clay to create George’s features. On top of that clay he would stretch out George’s skin—intact in one whole piece. His biggest hurdle was working on a species that had never been mounted before. Not surprisingly, taxidermy-supply companies do not make parts for extinct giant tortoises. “The beauty is that there’s no handbook on how to do it,” he says.


Dante was well aware he was working on what he had dubbed “the world’s pet.” As such, he knew there was no room for error. Every centimeter had to be scientifically accurate, from his saddle-back shell to the missing toenail on his left front foot. “We couldn’t just look at this as a project of mounting a Galápagos tortoise.” Dante says. “We are re-creating this character.”


He checked hundreds of pictures to fashion every wrinkle in George’s skin. He dashed green stains around George’s mouth and neck to make it appear as if the tortoise had just finished grazing. And he had a glass company create the world’s first pair of custom-made glass tortoise eyeballs for George, which meant visiting a local zoo to observe the intricate colors of a live tortoise’s eyes. When it came time for a pose, Dante consulted Fausto Llerena, who was a part of the group that first found George and the man who discovered he had died. Llerena advised Dante to portray George in a familiar stance, with his neck outstretched in dominance and yet with his tail tucked submissively. Llerena, who is also a well-known wood carver, sent Dante a hand-carved wooden tortoise as a sign of gratitude for restoring his friend of 40 years. “This is my Oscar,” Dante says of the softball-size carving.


On September 18, 2014, after 500 hours of labor conducted over more than a year, Dante was finally ready to present George to the museum and the people who helped bring him there. Among the congregation at George’s unveiling were several people who were also present for his death, including Gibbs and Sterling. They were all pleasantly surprised with Dante’s work. “You could see the look in his eye, and you could see the pose,” Sterling says. “He brought Lonesome George back to life.”


Surrounded by other species lost to time, George looked a little less lonesome. But the difference between him and his neighboring specimens was not lost on anyone who attended the unveiling. The other animals in the hall were driven to extinction by changing climates. George and his kind disappeared because of man.




First Direct Observations of How Roots Grow

As scientists look at crops to find ways to help them deal with climate change stress and growing populations, a tool has emerged to give them a new perspective: the view from underground.


Plants are a lot like icebergs: A bulk of their mass is invisible to the naked eye, buried in their roots. Roots allow plants to compensate for their stationary role in life, hunting for nutrients and diving to mine for water in times of drought.


These are abilities food security researchers would like to be able to enhance to develop more durable crops, but laboratory conditions currently confine experiments to the first few days or weeks of a sprouting plant's life.


Alexander Bucksch, a computer scientist turned plant genetic mathematician, said he was driven to find a way to shed light on roots in his postdoctoral work at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He was struck by how little is known about their growth and how similar the scale, overlap and diversity of branching was to other systems he had created visual models for in his previous work.


"I had an immediate interest in going underground," he said. "We knew hardly anything about mature root systems, even less how to control traits. I realized I could take my technical side and apply it to biology, to get the best of both."


Bringing together specialists in root genetics, plant physiology and agro-ecology, Bucksch built a computer program that uses an algorithm to interpret digital images of mature roots extracted from the field. It allowed him to analyze enough root samples with a high degree of uniformity to allow statistically significant results. This could give future researchers the ability to manipulate traits of crops that have been concealed, explained Malcolm Bennett, a professor of plant sciences at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom.


"For 10,000 years we've selected for aerial traits directly, but we haven't directly been able to select for the hidden half, though we know roots can greatly impact the very things we're trying to select for," he said. "This is an impressive gain towards being able to do what we've wanted to for a long time."


Measuring the unseen in a standardized way


"In maize [corn], you don't even see top roots grow within current studies," Bucksch said. "Before, the time scale people were working with was within a few weeks to a month at best; now we're talking about being able to see the growth of months, maybe even more."


Bennett explained that this limited how quickly researchers could process their samples, which with a living subject that continues to grow makes comparing data collected days apart tricky.


"We just didn't have a high enough throughput to work with," Bennett said. "In the 1920s, we began learning how to study plant roots in laboratories and greenhouses, but ultimately you've got to get out into the field, and to do so you need an objective, quick way to look at your findings."


In the 1980s, image-based techniques were applied to the study of roots to better predict how they might grow, but this process still didn't allow the kind of certainty needed for genetic study and was very time-consuming.


In 2011, Jonathan Lynch from Pennsylvania State University, now part of Bucksch's team, helped create an alternative, a way to standardize root sampling and generate more precise results, which he called "shovelomics." It called for roots to be extracted, washed and then measured against a protractor board for classification in a specific manner.


But there were still subjective factors that remained a problem. "Each person brings with them different levels of expertise, field knowledge and training into their interpretation, making scores subjective," Bucksch said. "We wanted to take counting and measuring out of the researcher's hands altogether to avoid this."


Speaking the same language


Within these additions also come the tools to match the visible traits of the plant with the genetic makeup of the trait. This was needed to unlock and explore root adaptive potential.


"What we can learn now is how plants change to meet their environment," Bucksch said. "What things have worked in the past for the plant is reflected in the angle, the branching and the dynamics of its root system."


Bennett added that he admired the range of factors the team, from both Penn State and Georgia Tech, took into consideration when working on the technology, ensuring it would be simplistic enough for use in developing countries.


"Their process costs cents to process, requires no huge input expense and is fast enough to make possible sequencing and eventually genomic insight," he said. "That's a huge gain for the field and a step towards helping us finally chisel out and incorporate ideal phenotypes into future crops."


Bucksch, who is confident their method will offer all types of researchers a new way to observe elements of mature plant life, said he never really doubted they would be successful, even though many different specialists were needed to create the final product.


"Biology is all about processes, and that is exactly what algorithms describe; the two have just developed different languages because they have grown in isolation from one another," he said. "Breaking down this initial barrier was probably the most difficult part of the entire project, but once we had done it, we knew we had something we could all work with."


www.eenews.net


Has Your Smartphone Made Your Other Gadgets Obsolete? [Survey]

Tell us how you use your smartphone, which gadgets it has replaced and where you would like to see the technology go


October 27, 2014 | |

Smartphones have become the Swiss Army knives of the digital age. No need to fill your pockets and handbags with cameras, maps and music players—just grab your all-in-one iPhone or Android device on your way out the door.


The new feature in iOS 8 promises to help the newest iPhones and iPads replace yet another staple of modern life: the credit card. Apple launched its latest attack on the status quo on October 20, with dozens of major retailers—Macy’s, McDonald’s and Whole Foods Market among them—ready to accept payment. Several banks, payment providers and app makers are likewise onboard. Google has on its Android devices for a few years, but the company has built little fanfare to usher its technology into the mainstream. The Apple effect could change that.


wants to know more about your smartphone use, the technology it has replaced and what capabilities you would like to see the gadgets offer in the future. How much has your smartphone changed your life?


Please fill out our survey below, choosing one answer for each question, before November 15. We will post the results on our Web site by early December.



People Prefer Electric Shocks to Tedium

See Inside

Many people prefer any activity to simply sitting quietly—even an electric shock


Oct 16, 2014 | |

“All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone,” said French philosopher and mathematician Blaise Pascal in the mid-17th century. The sentiment may be truer today than ever, according to a paper published July 4 in . Researchers asked participants to rate how much they enjoyed being in a room with nothing to do. Of 409 participants, nearly half said that they did not like the experience. When asked to do the same at home for six to 15 minutes, a third said that they had cheated.


In one telling experiment, each of 55 participants was seated alone in a quiet, empty room with nothing to do—except they had access to a button that would deliver an electric shock to their ankle which they had previously described as “unpleasant.” In their 15 minutes of solitude, 67 percent of the men and 25 percent of the women chose to shock themselves instead of simply sitting quietly. Lead author Timothy Wilson, a University of Virginia psychologist, says that with smartphones, tablets and TVs within reach anytime, many of us may not know what to do when we have time to ponder without distraction—but the electric shock results were still surprising. He suggests we could make our downtime—even traffic jams and waiting rooms—more relaxing and interesting by learning how to be alone with our thoughts.


“I suspect that practice helps, as does finding topics that you enjoy thinking about in detail and can return to time and again, so that you don't have to start from scratch each time,” Wilson says.


Can Viruses Treat Cancer?

See Inside

For some cancer patients, viruses engineered to zero in on tumor cells work like a wonder drug. The task now is to build on this success


In 1904 a woman in Italy confronted two life-threatening events: first, diagnosis with cancer of the uterine cervix, then a dog bite. Doctors delivered the rabies vaccine for the bite, and subsequently her “enormously large” tumor disappeared (“”). The woman lived cancer-free until 1912. Soon thereafter several other Italian patients with cervical cancer also received the vaccine—a live rabies virus that had been weakened. As reported by Nicola De Pace in 1910, tumors in some patients shrank, presumably because the virus somehow killed the cancer. All eventually relapsed and died, however.


Even though the patients perished, the notion of treating cancer with viruses able to kill malignant cells—now termed oncolytic virotherapy—was born. And investigators had some success in laboratory animals. Yet for a long time only partial responses and rare cures in human trials ensured that the field stayed at the fringes of cancer research. Viral therapy for cancer faced several additional hurdles: uncertainty about its mechanisms and how to use viruses to achieve cures, a dearth of tools with which to engineer more effective viral strains and the habitual reluctance of physicians to infect patients with pathogens. Doctors elected to use poisons (chemotherapy) instead of microbes—mostly because they were more comfortable with those drugs and understood them better.



*You must have purchased this issue or have a qualifying subscription to access this content


Sunday, October 26, 2014

Teaching Science with Kidlit

NGSS K-ESS2-2. Construct an argument supported by evidence for how plants and animals (including humans) can change the environment to meet their needs.

Try these book pairs:



For more suggestions and full lesson plans, check out Perfect Pairs :