Ice shelf collapse is worrisome because the shelves are fingers of ice that stick out into the ocean and act as plugs trapping Antarctic glaciers on land.
An Antarctic ice shelf that is twice the size of Hawaii is at “imminent risk” of collapse and needs to be monitored carefully, a new study finds.
The ice shelf—Larsen C—is located in roughly the same geography as the Larsen A and B ice shelves, which disintegrated in 1995 and 2002, respectively. Larsen C covers 19,300 square miles and is the largest shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula. If it melts, it could significantly raise global sea levels, said Paul Holland, the lead author of the study and a scientist with the British Antarctic Survey.
“If [Larsen C] collapses, this will cause several centimeters of sea-level rise, potentially within a few decades,” he said via email. “We therefore need to understand and predict this risk.”
Melting from the top and bottom
The ice has been thinning from below by 28 centimeters per year for the past 15 years, the study finds. To get this data, the scientists used airplanes to shoot radar waves at the shelf and measure its ice content. They also used satellite data.
Larsen C is also melting from the top at a rate of 4 centimeters per year, the study finds. The top melt is caused by a combination of decreased snowfall and occasional warmer temperatures. The Antarctic Peninsula has warmed by 2.5 degrees C in the past 50 years.
For the shelf to disintegrate due to the thinning alone would take centuries. Rather, as the thinning progresses, the shelf could reach tipping points, the study finds.
One tipping point would occur if the ice shelf’s front retreats past a critical zone, destabilizing the shelf. A crack in the shelf that may hasten this event already exists.
Another possibility is that the shelf may detach from the Bawden Ice Rise, which is “grounded” ice that attaches the ice shelf at its northern end to the continent. This, too, would cause the ice shelf to collapse rapidly, Holland said.
The scientists said they would like to test their results further, but running experiments in Antarctica can be prohibitively expensive.
“It would require a dedicated set of ocean, ice and atmosphere measurements lasting over 10 years ... this would require a very large amount of funding ... tens or hundreds of millions of dollars,” he said.
“What is more achievable is to keep repeating these radar surveys, and there are projects underway to look more into the atmosphere and ocean that are causing the changes we see,” he added.
www.eenews.net
No comments:
Post a Comment