Robots responding to Japan’s 2011 nuclear disaster initially played a marginal role due to limited capabilities. DARPA wants future robots to take the lead
ByAnybody home? The Aero (left) and CHIMP robots compete in the previous round of the DARPA Robotics Challenge.
Emergency-response robots have long suffered from having a range of mobility and dexterity comparable to a one-year-old child and a level of autonomy generally limited to completing a single task at a time. Nowhere was this more painfully obvious than in Japan four years ago, after a small squadron of robots was sent to assist workers at the devastated Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. The machines spent a good deal of time on the sidelines, leaving humans to do the most hazardous work.
The world will see just how far robots have advanced in the subsequent years when the U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) hosts the aimed at building autonomous machines that can step—or roll—in when disasters strike. A total of 25 international teams will compete June 5 and 6 to win one of three cash prizes totaling $3.5 million.
When in Fukushima in , they found the facility contaminated by radiation and deluged by . A magnitude 9.0 undersea earthquake had created a tsunami, which pushed massive amounts of ocean water into the plant and disabled the emergency generators required to cool the nuclear reactors. The following three weeks featured meltdowns, gas explosions and radiation leaks that worsened the situation.
Responders soon found that the need for radiation shielding on the robots, in combination with other factors, created disruptions in communication that left the machines operating without instruction for periods of time. Robots from iRobot and Honeywell—both of which had been developed using DARPA funds— with some damage assessment and cleanup—and some continue to operate at Fukushima—but they were of limited use during the emergency when the site was at its most dangerous.
The previous round of the required robots to engage an emergency shutoff switch, get up from a prone position, travel 10 meters without falling, pass over a barrier and rotate a circular valve 360 degrees. The final competition will feature similar—but not the same—challenges so that teams are forced to demonstrate some flexibility and cannot script all of their robot’s moves ahead of time.
Regardless of which robot takes home the big purse, there is still a long way to go before machines can operate autonomously in unpredictable environments such as those found when disaster strikes. “The robots that you’re going to see at the challenge are very far from fieldable systems” that could be sent into a situation such as , Pratt said.
No comments:
Post a Comment